Fiberguild

CNN reports that consumers are becoming suspicious of the “Organic” label:

The percentage of consumers who believe organic products are good for them is down to 45%, while those who believe they’re good for the environment has fallen to 48%, according to the latest survey from consulting firm WSL Strategic Retail. Both measures stood at a 54% approval rating two years ago.

All I can say is it is about time. In The Omnivore’s Dilemma A Natural History of Four Meals Michael Poulan did a masterful job of illustrating how corporate America has taken over the organic movement, corrupting government policy and regulation, and turning a healthy alternative into yet another way to create profit.

We have toyed with the idea of getting “organic certification” but so far have rejected it.  There are multiple reasons for this.

1. Cost
2. Unnecessary restrictions
3. Animal health and welfare

Some of the requirements for certification are simply over the top.  Banning use of antibiotics and/or parsiticides can compromise herd health for little gain.  Frankly, if an animal gets sick and needs veterinary intervention, we are going to provide that intervention.  This is far different than routine use of medications!

Some requirements make little sense.  Pressure treated posts are fine if they are installed at the time of certification, but no new one’s can be used after certification.  Huh??

So, we have billed ourselves as “natural” and “free range” because that is what we are.  We have not applied any chemicals on our property in almost 5 years.  Our local eco-system is healthy and getting healthier, evidenced by the increase in bird and mammal species observed.

Now, if we can only figure out how to get rid of the knot weed on the corner of the property without resorting to poisons we will be OK…